I've noticed no one besides Trevor responded, which is cool. I honestly don't think I would have desired to comment on those questions myself if given the choice. But since I did create the post and posed the questions, i 'll attempt a response...
Since I posted those questions a week ago a couple things have influenced the way I'll respond. The first involves an interaction I had with a Mormon friend. Last week, me and my big mouth asked my Mormon friend, "So what is the standard response when someone says your faith was started by one man's word who claimed to find some stone tablets barely one hundred years ago?" Maybe that wasn't the best way to start the conversation out but she attempted a response anyway. We went on in this conversation for 20 minutes or so. In the midst of the conversation I wanted to scoff and ask crafty apologetic questions to put her on her heels. I was frustrated by her answers and my mind began dreaming of all the comebacks I could have used to "prove" my faith against hers and i may have even verbalized a few of those. An hour later I felt foolish. To a degree, i went back to the old "stand up and fight for what is true" Christianity. That attitude did nothing for our relationship. In fact, I felt like I needed to go back and patch some things up and make sure I didn't damage it. That conversation with her seemed to affirm, at least for me and my personality, that debate and argument is not the most effective means for communicating what I believe to be true.
I'll act real postmodern here...What should be valued more? Words/knowledge? Or deeds/actions? Most of us grew up and still read Bibles in which Jesus' words are in red colored font. Why are only his spoken words in red? Are his words more important than his actions? In this season of Lent, I've been reading out of the gospel of Mark. In my Bible, the gospel of Mark is full of the red letter print of Christ's words until you come to the story of the crucifixion. Mark uses the last three chapters to tell of the crucifixion and resurrection which is the very epicenter of our faith. The weird thing is when I read of the account of the crucifixion there are very few red letters. Is that part of the story less important than the red letter portions? Would St. Mark have appreciated red letter Bibles? He decided to devote three whole chapters to tell about Jesus' crucifixion. It seems that to Mark (as well as to Paul and others) what Jesus did, not what he said, is what really changed the world.
One of the first things I learned in my seminary training was how to craft an argument for the sake of "winning" someone to Christ. And in the church i grew up in there seemed to be this close association in sharing Christ with someone and the idea of competition. I can remember getting big trophies and Snicker bars for learning the most Bible verses or bringing the most friends to church. From an early age, many of us experienced living the life of Jesus as a competitive sport against someone or something else. And in no way am i negating the power of Jesus' or any of our words. I'm simply saying that communcating knowledge through speech is no more and maybe even less valuable than the deeds we display. And not just our deeds but the posture and countenance we display as we carry out those deeds. I wonder how many times Jesus bent down to speak with children. Or how many times Jesus extended his hand to lovingly touch a stranger when speaking with them. I've always thought it facinating that when he healed people, he usually touched them. The maker of the moon and stars could simply speak the words if he so chose. But he seems to communicate that posture and countenance was just as highly valued if not more than what was actually being spoken.
Anyone still reading?
As we approach St. Patty's Day, I highly recommend checking out the history of St. Patrick, the man who brought the gospel of Jesus Christ to Ireland. In St. Patrick's missionary journey, he, like Christ, also was known more for his deeds. He's known for chasing the snakes out of Ireland, which meant he lived in such a way that the pagan druids who ruled the land were changed by the powerful way St. Pat lived his life and shared Christ. He was said to be a man of humble-mind, not one who could over power the druid dudes with his supreme knowledge and debate skills.
And finally (and it's about time, eh?) as i've thought through this idea of truth, debate, argument, etc. i'll close with the words of 2 saints which I believe sum up this conversation better than I ever could.
"Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke, and encourage---with great patience and careful instruction." -St. Paul
"Preach the gospel always, if necessary use words." -St. Francis of Assisi
Happy St. Patty's Day
Recent Comments